![]() |
|||||
|
|
Tom
Maxwell
Only William Shatner, the embodiment of irony, would be able to turn such a heavy-handed, morally bankrupt and repetitive show as T.J. Hooker into a paradigm of television entertainment. His affectation and bullying, his preening, and his frequent fits of self-righteous rage are central to the show's success. Shatner's unwavering self-concern works to its greatest effect in the show's stiff and distant "consoling" scenes, and his obvious distaste for anything physically demanding combined with his visible paunch and artificial demeanor make for some riotous action sequences. Only William Shatner, who exists in the strange non-realm of absolute self-importance and constant self-mockery, could impart that marvelous unconscious irony to what would otherwise be a dull-witted, mechanical loser. Shatner is in fact so entertaining that he could successfully co-star with mannequins, and actually he does: the doe-eyed and invariably dubbed Heather Locklear (the Cheesecake), who really adds a sense of otherworldliness when her disembodied voice appears on the soundtrack; the smug and irritating Adrian Zmed (the Beefcake); the forgettable James Darren; and some other guy whose name escapes me but he's done bit parts for a long time. All are uniformly wooden, and each is crowned with a similar immaculate helmet hairdo. More like the amnesiac stars of Gillligan's Island than the show's contemporary Hill Street Blues, the characters in Hooker rarely have a past, and people that appear in Hooker's life, if they survive, serve only to underscore his inability to have meaningfull relationships. Close relatives, old friends and ex-flames are introduced, then quickly kidnapped or killed so Hooker can go berserk because he's "emotionally involved." The exception are Hooker's children - a blank little boy and a hot 13-year-old blonde with pigtails, realistically dressed in a short blue dress and white knee socks and clutching a teddy bear. Shatner, by the way, is wonderful with children. His interpretations of intimacy and fatherhood give particular delight. People in the world of T. J. Hooker are automatons and object types, reacting predictably to "new" situations.
Situations, I think, created in the mind of T. J. Hooker himself. This assertion is compelling and changes the whole meaning of the show. The plots, for example, are so shockingly repetitive and wish-fulfilling as to suggest a cherished daydream. Certainly the one-sided crooks and sidekicks lend credence to this idea. So, for the sake of illustration, I will substitute the word "fantasy" for "episode" from here on. The smallest number of viewings reveals strict adherence to the same set of situations, responses and plot devices. These standards are easily enumerated:
Interspersed throughout are the usuals - numbingly unimaginative business names like "Community Hospital" or "Gear Box Transmission" (really pointless details for a mind careening towards its next dose of wish fulfillment), the soulless soundtrack, and always Shatner's wonderfully ornate delivery and exaggeration. The fantasies directed by Shatner himself outdo themselves in camp over-the-top drama, and are the most shining examples of the show's dream world orientation. Hooker succeeds in spite of itself, and is a treasure trove of unintended hilarity. If each episode started with Hooker falling asleep or staring absently from behind his desk, the series would have been received as a work of genius. It is a testament to the great and complex talents of William Shatner that he can create the perfect over-the-hill loser -- at once effete and macho, mincing and domineering -- pretending to greatness. A lesson for us all. [Ed Note: Believe it or not, you can get thet ShatMan's take on the cultural/critical differences between T.J. Hooker and Captain Kirk here.] Tom
Maxwell helped lead the gifted Squirrel Nut Zippers into neo-Swing infamy
before embarking on a solo career, fatherhood, and a quest to completely
own his artistic output. So far, it's going great (fatherhood, that is).
|
| |||
|
Copyright 2001, Morphizm.com. All Rights Reserved. |
|||||